This
is a post I’ve wanted to write for some time now, but I've been waiting to do
it until we were closer to the big City Council election that this entire
season of Parks & Rec has been
leading up to. Now that we’re just about
at the big event, it’s a good time to take a step back and explore what a
“Councilwoman Knope” might mean for one of the most consistently funny and all
around best shows on TV. Naturally,
we’re all rooting emotionally for Leslie to triumph over the likable but
massively unqualified Bobby Newport, portrayed so perfectly by Paul Rudd. Over the last four years Amy Poehler has won
us all over with her well meaning, always optimistic, waffle loving public servant,
so of course we want to see her accomplish what she’s worked so hard to
achieve. But, just because a Knope
victory is clearly the best thing for the town of Pawnee, Indiana, does that
necessary mean that it will it be the best thing for Parks & Rec, in season 5 and beyond?
Change
is a dangerous thing for any TV show, especially a half an hour sitcom. Even the name itself, “situational comedy”,
implies that the humor comes from the situation, which is why we don’t often
see that situation drastically altered.
On occasion, when a comedy’s been on the air forever and starting to get
stale, shaking things up can be preferable to more of the same, but for a show
like Parks & Rec, which is in its
prime and consistently firing on all cylinders, it’s easy to wonder why even
consider changing anything at all. And
yet, stagnancy just isn’t in Parks &
Rec’s DNA. Hell, anyone who has ever
recommended Parks & Rec to a
friend has had this exact conversation: “the show is great, but its first
season kinda sucks, so either just skip it, or don’t judge it until you get
into the second season.” The show could
have stuck to its guns after that first season, and continued along the same mediocre or sucky path,
which probably would have lead to cancellation after another season or so. But, Parks
& Rec recognized what worked and what didn’t, and made the changes it
needed to, mixing up the cast, tweaking the characters, and developing the
relationships that worked best. Even
when things have been going well for the show, Parks & Rec has been no stranger to change. We’ve seen characters, like April and Andy,
who were perfectly funny as as they were, if not somewhat one
dimensional, begin to grow into more fully developed human beings, and the show
has been better for it. We’ve seen Ben go from Leslie’s uptight boss, to nerdy
co-worker, to now supportive boyfriend and campaign manager. Rob Lowe’s eternally optimistic Chris Traiger
has always very carefully toed the line between hilarious and grating, without
ever stepping over it. His character works, and the show could
have easily had him continue to play that one-note until that line was finally one day
crossed, but instead has challenged that eternal optimism with a series of
disappointments that have helped keep the character fresh and interesting.
Even with all that, removing Leslie, even on a part time basis, from the Parks
& Rec department, would be by far the biggest change that this show has
taken on. The Parks & Rec department is the center of this show. It's the common thread that weaves all the characters together, and it's generally been our window through which we view the rest of Pawnee. Sure, this season, for the most part,
has successfully taken the focus away from the department and put it on the
campaign, but it’s only for one season, and by having the Parks & Rec employees also serve as Leslie's campaign staff, it's seamlessly been able to incorporate the rest of the cast. In contrast, the implications of a long term shift away
from the Parks and Rec department, and more towards the operations of elected
local government, threaten the very nature of the show itself. Or you know what, maybe it doesn’t. Despite what Ron Swanson would have you
believe, the show is not as much about the Parks and Rec department as it is
about the good things that government can accomplish when good people set out
with good intentions. If the show can
find a way to keep the rest of the cast engaged in interesting and funny ways,
a shift to Leslie Knope’s trials and tribulations as a member of the Pawnee
City Council may be the perfect way to raise this theme to the next level, and
to continue to explore it in ways that don’t involve parks and public drinking
fountains. I’m certainly not sold, but
considering this show’s track record, if Leslie comes out victorious, I’m
prepared to go into season 5 optimistic and with an open mind.
Knope
2012!
No comments:
Post a Comment